David Shuster is a trial lawyer and the firm's Managing Principal. Dave enjoys the relationships that are developed and the diverse legal challenges that are presented in a varied law practice. Dave represents commercial clients in business litigation, construction claims, and real estate litigation. In addition, he has particular experience representing professionals and prominent members of the community in sensitive matters. Dave also has significant experience representing plaintiffs in claims involving serious personal injuries. As plaintiff's counsel, Dave has recovered millions for his clients. He enjoys and excels at being a trusted advisor to clients who are confronted with uniquely-complex legal challenges.
Dave is recognized annually in The Best Lawyers in America since 2018 and Maryland Super Lawyers since 2009. He was invited to serve as an instructor in the civil litigation program of the Court of Appeals' Professionalism Course for New Admittees of the Maryland Bar, and he is a member of the Character Committee of the Court of Appeals of Maryland for the Sixth Appellate Circuit. He has also served as an adjunct professor at the University of Baltimore School of Law, where he taught appellate advocacy and legal analysis, research, and writing courses. In law school, he was an Associate Editor of the University of Baltimore Law Review.
Casey Cares Foundation, Advisory Board
Downtown Partnership of Baltimore, Board of Directors
CollegeBound Foundation, Lawyers' Campaign Executive Committee, Member, former Co-Chair
Court of Appeals of Maryland Sixth Appellate Circuit, Character Committee
The Wranglers, Member, past President
American Bar Association
Bar Association of Baltimore City
Baltimore County Bar Association
Maryland State Bar Association
National Association of Bankruptcy Trustees
Co-author, "Litigating Against Bad Debtors: Protecting Against the Spoliation of ESI," American Bankruptcy Trustee Journal, 2017
Outside the Office
Growing up playing ice hockey, Dave coached his sons' youth hockey teams and enjoys playing in area adult hockey leagues. He is a dedicated cyclist and has completed many century (100+ miles) rides. Along with several other colleagues at the firm, Dave organizes the firm’s annual "Ride to the Tide" – a 125-mile bicycle ride from the firm's office building to the Maryland State Bar Association's Annual Meeting in Ocean City, Maryland. Over the years, cyclists in the Ride to the Tide have included the firm's lawyers and summer associates, clients, local attorneys, judges, and other friends of the firm.
Successful Settlements of Injury Claims
Secured favorable settlements for several claimants alleging injuries from pharmaceutical products.
Secured favorable settlement for an operator of industrial equipment who sustained serious personal injuries.
Secured favorable settlement for an adult driver and minor passengers hit by an oncoming vehicle.
Secured favorable settlement for the back-seat passenger of a vehicle that was rear-ended on the highway.
Secured favorable settlement for a pedestrian who was hit by an automobile in a parking lot.
Secured favorable settlement for an adult driver and minor passengers hit by an oncoming car.
Secured favorable settlement for a passenger of a for-hire vehicle.
Secured favorable settlement for a pedestrian who was fatally injured by a vehicle.
Secured favorable settlement for a cyclist hit by a vehicle.
Secured favorable settlement for a driver and passenger who were hit by vehicle that ran a red light.
Secured favorable settlement for a professional athlete in a rear-end collision.
Slip and Fall
Secured favorable settlement of a slip-and-fall claim (office building).
Secured favorable settlement of a slip-and-fall claim (commercial building).
Secured favorable settlement of a slip-and-fall claim (independent restaurant).
Secured favorable settlement of a slip-and-fall claim (store).
Secured favorable settlement of a slip-and-fall claim (chain restaurant).
Secured favorable settlement of a slip-and-fall (bus).
Secured favorable settlement for a patient of a gynecologic procedure.
Secured favorable settlement for a patient of an ophthalmology procedure.
Secured favorable settlement for a patient of orthopedic procedure.
Secured favorable settlement for a patient who developed complications following a post-operative infection.
Secured favorable settlement for a patient who developed complications following a colonoscopy.
Secured favorable settlement for a patient who developed complications from a tumor.
Professionals / High-Level Executives / Business Principals
Legal malpractice claims. Represented various lawyers and law firms in legal malpractice actions and in matters involving allegations of professional misconduct. Successes include obtaining summary judgment on behalf of a law firm in a malpractice case filed by the firm's former client who alleged malpractice in connection with a commercial transaction.
Lender liability claims. Represented various lending industry parties (e.g., loan brokerage company, in-house counsel, and loan officers) in cases involving claims of lender-liability and wrongdoing in connection with the issuance, underwriting, and collateralization of commercial and residential loans. Successes include defeating loan guarantor's efforts to enjoin lender's collection and execution proceedings.
Dispute between principals of land development venture. Successfully represented a client against his partner in a dispute concerning a land-development project. The client's partner filed suit seeking reimbursement of investment payments and the re-titling of real estate. The client filed a counterclaim. The court granted summary judgment for the client and against the client's partner on the partner's complaint, and the client obtained a money judgment against the partner on the client's counterclaim.
Construction / Real Estate
Recovery of Commercial Real Estate Commissions. Represented a commercial real estate brokerage company that filed suit to recover commissions in connection with the sale of a multi-million dollar high-rise office building. Despite the absence of a formal written agreement between the parties, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the broker after a multi-day jury trial; the case resolved during the subsequent appeal.
Property Boundary Dispute. Successfully defended a regional homebuilder at trial in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for Sussex County. The lawsuit alleged that a section of a residential subdivision was not constructed in accordance with county-approved development plans and, as a result, the placement of a road and related utilities encroached on residential lots. The court declined to award the any of the remedies sought by the plaintiff.
Property Boundary Dispute. Obtained dismissal of a lawsuit filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County against a regional homebuilder in a suit alleging that residential lots encroached on a public right of way.
Construction Dispute. Successfully represented at trial and on appeal a general contractor against a subcontractor that withdrew from a fast-track public construction project before the parties entered into a formal written contract. Shortly before the subcontractor's work was to commence, the sub notified the GC that the sub would not proceed, which forced the GC to hire a substitute subcontractor at a substantially higher price. Despite the absence of a formal written contract between the parties, the jury returned a verdict for the GC for an amount that represented the difference between the sub's original price and the replacement sub's higher price. Following the multi-day jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, the subcontractor appealed; the judgment was affirmed on appeal.
Construction Dispute. Successfully represented an EIFS/Stucco subcontractor in an arbitration filed against a general contractor and project owner. The owner alleged that it was not obligated to pay the subcontractor because the building had water-intrusion problems caused, allegedly, by the improper installation of the exterior stucco system. The arbitrator rejected that defense, and issued a monetary award in favor of the client.
Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Successfully represented a retired professional athlete in a suit brought by a current professional athlete concerning damage to a rental property. In a bench trial, the judge returned a verdict in favor of the client.
Professional Disability Insurance
Successfully represented a physician in a federal lawsuit filed by his disability insurance company. The insurer alleged that the physician's injury was not accidental and, therefore, the insurer was defrauded into paying monthly disability insurance benefits. The insurer sought the return of the disability benefits that had been paid and the physician sought a determination that the injury was accidental. Given the amount of the monthly benefits and the number of years remaining on the policies, the physician's claim was substantial. After a multi-day jury trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the physician. At the conclusion of the matter, the insurance company paid a substantial amount for the physician's attorneys' fees.
Successfully represented the manufacturer of an asbestos-containing product in an appeal in the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. The plaintiff obtained a multi-million jury award against the client at the circuit court level. The Court of Special Appeals reversed the jury's verdict and remanded the case for a new trial, finding that the circuit court erred in connection with several pretrial procedural rulings that prejudiced the defendant's ability to defend the claim.
Successfully represented a general contractor (appellee) on an appeal by a subcontractor (appellant) from a money judgment against the subcontractor for abandoning a fast-track public construction project. Court of Special Appeals rejected all of appellant's appeal points, and affirmed the jury's award in its entirety.
Successfully represented a real-estate development and construction company (appellee) on an appeal by a contractor (appellant) from a defense verdict in a collection action. At trial, the contractor argued that the client owed the contractor money for construction services performed in the build-out of an office building. The Court of Special Appeals rejected all of appellant's appeal points, and affirmed the judgment in favor of the client.
Successfully handled a number of disputes for condominium unit owners against developers, builders, and condominium associations
Debtor-Creditor / Asset Recovery
As special litigation counsel to the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Trustee, successfully argued before the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland in Schlossberg, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Vincent Abell et al., Adversary Proceeding No.: 14-00417-TJC, that spoliation by the defendants was so egregious that terminating sanctions were justified. The Court entered a judgment that effectively required the turnover of scores of properties and bank accounts to the firm’s client. The case is significant both for its use of the continuing concealment doctrine in the recovery of assets and for the Court’s opinion on spoliation, which provides the latest, most comprehensive judicial discussion of sanctions for the destruction of ESI.
Served as special litigation counsel to bankruptcy trustees in two related adversary proceedings seeking the recovery of assets from affiliates and family members of two individual debtors pursuant to fraudulent conveyance and continuing concealment claims. Successfully transferred the action from the bankruptcy court to the U.S. District Court and successfully opposed the defendants' motion to strike the trustees' request for a jury trial. Successfully opposed the defendants' motion to dismiss and, thereafter, procured a court-approved settlement pursuant to which defendants paid $1.6 million into the bankruptcy estate.
Represented lead creditor in bankruptcy action to pursue debtor/construction company's claims for payment against national retailer for fees owed in connection with build-outs of retail stores across the country. Achieved favorable settlement for bankruptcy estate.
Represented a commercial judgment creditor in post-judgment collection proceedings against a commercial judgment debtor. In another federal district, the judgment creditor obtained a $1 million judgment against a Maryland company. As a result of successful collection efforts, the debtor posted a letter of credit that fully secured the judgment pending the appeal.
Dave routinely serves as local counsel in Maryland state courts and in the federal courts within the District of Maryland. In his capacity as local counsel, he has worked with many national and regional lead-counsel firms. References for local counsel engagements are available upon request.
This month’s American Bankruptcy Trustee Journal features “Litigating Against Bad Debtors: Protecting Against the Spoliation of ESI,” written by Jean Lewis and Dave Shuster, litigation attorneys who have served as special litigation counsel to bankruptcy trustees in several adversary proceedings.
The challenges of identifying and preparing corporate designees for Rule 30(b)(6) depositions.
Trial attorneys Jean Lewis and Dave Shuster serve as special litigation counsel to bankruptcy trustees in adversary proceedings. The team was recently engaged by Chapter 11 Trustee Roger Schlossberg to pursue claims against a debtor, his estranged wife, and dozens of companies and family members who were involved in concealing the debtor’s assets.
11/04/2016 | Baltimore Business Journal
Per attorney, according to recent surveys, Kramon & Graham is one of the nation’s leading firms in terms of charitable giving.
Kramon & Graham Prevails in Request for Terminating Sanctions for Massive Spoliation in Fraudulent Concealment Adversary Proceeding05/02/2016
The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland recently delivered a potentially landmark opinion in a case involving spoliation and the concealment of assets by a bankruptcy debtor and his wife.
To protect the legal rights of cyclists involved in serious crashes, Kramon & Graham trial lawyer Dave Shuster developed “The Cyclist’s Essential Checklist,” which he distributed at his April 2016 presentation, “A Legal Primer for Cyclists.” Keep these tips in mind when dealing with motorists, the police, and insurance companies in the event of a motor vehicle-bike accident.
Kramon & Graham principals Lee Ogburn, David Shuster, and Stuart Seraina – together with nine friends of the firm – completed the 20th Ride to the Tide, the firm’s annual, 125-mile bicycle ride to the Maryland State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting in Ocean City, Maryland.
On March 21, 2014, the Court of Appeals of Maryland appointed firm principal David J. Shuster and several other members of the Maryland Bar to the Character Committee of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Appellate Circuit.
On December 23, 2013, Dave Shuster and Rig Baldwin filed a wrongful death lawsuit on behalf of the widow of a highly-respected local businessman who was fatally injured in a catastrophic accident in his back yard in Arnold, Maryland.
Kramon & Graham principals Dave Shuster and Jean Lewis will co-present “Spoiling for a Fight -- Preventing, Spotting and Addressing ESI Destruction” at the Maryland State Bar Association Annual Meeting taking place June 14 – 17 in Ocean City, Maryland.
Kramon & Graham principals Geoff Genth, Dave Shuster, and U.S. District Judge George Hazel recently led a discussion on jurisdiction, removal, and venue at the Maryland Chapter of the Federal Bar Association program "Introduction to Federal Practice."
Cyclists today feel more vulnerable than ever. The cyclist-motorist relationship is at an all-time low. In the past five years, Maryland has seen 3,800 car-bike crashes. Thirty riders have been killed and another 3,100 have been injured. Our cycling community has become, unfortunately, all too familiar with these tragedies. Each of these incidents presents complicated legal issues and raise important questions about the safety and legal rights of cyclists.
On April 24, 2015, at the annual Forensic Valuation Conference of the Maryland Association of CPAs (MACPA), managing principal David Shuster served as an invited speaker on the subject of becoming a successful expert witness.
On February 25, 2015, Kramon & Graham principals George Brown and David Shuster gave a presentation to the Baltimore Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel.
Managing Principal David J. Shuster was honored to be asked again to serve as an instructor in the Court of Appeals’ Professionalism Course for New Admittees of the Maryland Bar.
On May 16, 2014, firm principal David Shuster was invited to speak at the 2014 Forensic Valuation Conference sponsored by the Maryland Association of Certified Public Accountants.
On May 7, 2014, during a meeting of the Baltimore Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel, Kramon & Graham attorney David Shuster participated in a panel discussion on the subject of appellate practice and procedure.
Three Kramon & Graham principals participated in a panel discussion on subject matter jurisdiction, venue, and removal at the Southern Division of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland.
David Shuster was invited to speak at the membership meeting of the Heating & Air Conditioning Contractors of Maryland.
David Shuster gave a presentation to the Baltimore Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel on October 20, 2013 on the subject of preparing corporate representatives for corporate designee depositions and the pitfalls of unprepared witnesses.
David Shuster presented at the Maryland Association of CPAs (MACPA) Business Valuation Conference.
David Shuster recently participated in a roundtable discussion.
David Shuster was invited to return as an instructor of the Court of Appeals’ Professionalism Course for New Admittees of the Maryland Bar.
Kramon & Graham announced today that five firm principals have been named "Lawyer of the Year" in the 2019 edition of The Best Lawyers in America. In addition, sixteen firm attorneys were selected for inclusion in the ranking guide. The attorneys represent Kramon & Graham's full range of practices from litigation to transactional services.
Kramon & Graham announced today that twenty-two of its lawyers have been selected for inclusion in the 2018 Maryland Super Lawyers list.
Kramon & Graham, a leading law firm providing litigation, real estate, and transactional services, is pleased to announce that thirteen firm attorneys have been selected for inclusion in the 2018 edition of The Best Lawyers in America.
Kramon & Graham principals Andrew Jay Graham, Natalie McSherry named to Top 10: 2017 Maryland Super Lawyers list for eighth consecutive year12/12/2016
Kramon & Graham, a nationally recognized full service law firm with 35 attorneys, announced today that twenty-one of its lawyers have been selected for inclusion in the 2017 Maryland Super Lawyers and Rising Stars lists.
Kramon & Graham, a nationally recognized full service law firm with 34 attorneys, announced today that seventeen of its lawyers have been selected for inclusion in the 2016 Maryland Super Lawyers legal ranking guide, including four up-and-coming attorneys who are recognized as "Rising Stars."
Kramon & Graham congratulates nineteen lawyers named to Maryland Super Lawyers 2015.
Kramon & Graham congratulates eighteen lawyers named to Maryland Super Lawyers 2014
Kramon & Graham attorneys named to Maryland Super Lawyers Top 10, Top 50 Women, and Top 100 lists; Super Lawyers; and Maryland Rising Stars.
- Articles and Presentations by David Shuster